The digital asset landscape has matured from bold experiments into a new phase defined by performance, efficiency, and practical utility. Bitcoin laid the foundation by proving that decentralized money could exist, but the conversation has now shifted to what can deliver real‑world payments at scale.
In this evolving environment, XRP is increasingly positioned as the network that doesn’t just demonstrate possibility — it perfects functionality.
From Experiment to Utility
The debate resurfaced recently when John Squire referenced a remark by Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, who said during the 2017 Singapore Fintech Festival that Bitcoin was a great experiment, but not for payments.
The comment, made nearly a decade ago, remains highly relevant. While Bitcoin validated the concept of blockchain‑based money, its limitations for everyday transactions continue to drive the search for networks built for payment purposes.
🚨 BTC PROVED IT. $XRP PERFECTS IT. 🚨
Brad Garlinghouse: “Bitcoin was a great experiment, but not for payments.” 💬
The new financial era runs on utility, not experiments. 🚀🚀 pic.twitter.com/hZ5cdJwIAu
— John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) October 3, 2025
What Bitcoin Achieved
Bitcoin’s achievement cannot be overstated. It proved that decentralized, censorship‑resistant digital money could function at scale, sparking a technological and financial revolution. It remains a trusted store of value, often described as “digital gold.”
Yet its proof‑of‑work system and limited capacity — processing only around seven transactions per second — have long restricted its role as a practical payment network. Rising fees during periods of congestion further highlight the challenge of using Bitcoin for low‑cost, high‑frequency transfers.
How XRP Advances the Model
This is where XRP diverges. The XRP Ledger (XRPL) was designed specifically for payments, focusing on speed, efficiency, and cost‑effectiveness. Transactions settle in three to five seconds, fees remain consistently negligible, and the network is capable of thousands of transactions per second.
Unlike Bitcoin’s energy‑intensive proof‑of‑work, XRPL relies on a consensus mechanism optimized for performance, making it well‑suited for cross‑border transfers, remittances, and enterprise‑grade financial infrastructure.
We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1
— TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025
Utility Over Ideology
The contrast highlights a critical evolution in the crypto space. Bitcoin proved the philosophy of decentralized value transfer, but XRP is designed to deliver the mechanics of seamless payments.
The two assets are not in competition for the same role — rather, they represent different phases of blockchain’s progression. Bitcoin continues to serve as a store of value, while XRP is engineered as financial infrastructure for a world increasingly driven by speed, efficiency, and interoperability.
A New Financial Era
Institutions, payment providers, and fintech innovators are seeking scalable and reliable solutions, driving demand for networks that offer tangible benefits and real‑world utility.
John Squire’s framing of the debate captures this turning point: the next era of finance will not be built on experiments but on systems that can meet the demands of global commerce. XRP’s design and growing use cases position it at the heart of this transition.
In summary, Bitcoin pioneered the concept of decentralized digital money, paving the way for an entire industry to emerge. But as Garlinghouse observed, proving the concept is not the same as perfecting it for payments.
XRP’s speed, scalability, and low costs make a case for its potential to serve as the foundation for the future financial infrastructure. In a world now focused on utility rather than ideology, XRP offers a blueprint for how blockchain can truly power the future of global payments.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in‑depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.