Michael Burry has intensified his longstanding criticism of Bitcoin, claiming that the cryptocurrency’s rise to six-figure levels is a sign of a speculative bubble not tied to any quantifiable fact.
Burry, widely known for identifying the vulnerabilities that preceded the 2008 financial crisis, noted that the widespread acceptance of Bitcoin’s high price levels shows how far valuations have drifted from reality. His latest remarks contribute to the growing debate among market participants seeking to discern divergent signals across risk assets as the year draws to a close.
Michael Burry Expands His Criticism of Bitcoin
Speaking with The Big Short author Michael Lewis on a podcast, Burry described Bitcoin as “not worth anything,” echoing concerns he has voiced for years. He again compared the digital asset to the tulip mania bubble of the 1600s, stressing that the speculative pattern he sees in Bitcoin’s market behavior goes beyond historical parallels. He believes that the benefits of cryptocurrency, such as facilitating financial operations that are hard to trace, also increase the risks.
Burry noted that the six-figure price normalization of Bitcoin has become the new normal, and how market commentators talk about price changes between $100,000 and $98,000 in a casual manner, without considering the underlying value. He called such acceptance the most ridiculous, and he proceeded to mention that it had solidified even further his belief that the Bitcoin market narrative had lost its grip on fundamentals.
His new attacks come after a period of Burry reentering the fray after some years of relative silence. During the past few weeks, he has revealed large bearish stakes against Nvidia and Palantir, and claimed that Tesla is absurdly overpriced. He has sounded the alarm on numerous occasions concerning what he considers a growing bubble in assets associated with artificial-intelligence themes.
JPMorgan Notes Investor Confusion in Divergent Market Signals
The discussion surrounding Bitcoin’s role in the broader financial landscape intensified further after JPMorgan portfolio manager Jack Caffrey highlighted its usefulness as a risk-sentiment indicator. Caffrey, in an appearance on CNBC’s Squawk Box on Tuesday, noted a recent disconnect between Bitcoin and gold, indicating that the persistent weakness of Bitcoin and the simultaneous surge in gold have raised questions about the asset’s increasing market identity.
Caffrey opined that the trend can be attributed to several reasons, among them whether investors are positioning themselves for an upturn in the yield curve, which may be favourable to gold. He cited differing performance in both equities, as well as leadership in interactive-media companies like Alphabet and strength in pharmaceutical names like Johnson & Johnson. These two conflicting messages, according to him, demonstrate the more widespread uncertainty that investors are trying to decipher as we move into year-end.
JPMorgan has also made new moves as part of its digital asset strategy. The bank has recently introduced structured notes backed by Bitcoin ETFs and plans to enable institutional clients to pledge Bitcoin and Ether on certain loans by the year-end.