A group of Democratic lawmakers has sharply criticized the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for what they describe as a dramatic retreat from enforcing U.S. securities laws against major cryptocurrency firms, warning that the move threatens investors and market integrity.
In a letter to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, Democratic Representatives Maxine Waters, Sean Casten, and Brad Sherman criticized the SEC for abruptly dropping at least a dozen crypto enforcement cases since early 2025.
Essentially, since Trump’s inauguration, the Commission has dismissed or closed at least a dozen high-profile crypto cases, including ongoing litigation against Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken—despite favorable court rulings supporting the SEC’s allegations of fraud and unregistered securities offerings. For example, the SEC had successfully defeated motions to dismiss claims against Binance and Coinbase, yet voluntarily dropped these cases, citing regulatory discretion rather than legal merit.
The Democrats argue that the timing of the closures raises questions about political influence, noting that many crypto companies involved—including Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, Robinhood, and Crypto.com—donated millions to former President Trump’s campaign and inauguration.
Justin Sun Faces Scrutiny Amid Enforcement Questions
The letter specifically mentions Justin Sun, founder of the Tron Foundation, whose SEC case remains paused while he continues investing millions in Trump-linked crypto ventures. Lawmakers express concern that Sun’s ties to China and the Chinese Communist Party could amplify risks to U.S. market integrity.
Lawmakers urge the SEC to lift the stay on Sun’s case or negotiate a settlement reflecting the strength of the SEC’s claims. They also request documents and communications regarding the SEC’s decision-making process and any potential political or foreign influence on enforcement actions.
The letter underscores a growing tension over the SEC’s role in regulating cryptocurrencies and protecting U.S. investors amid a rapidly evolving, politically charged digital asset market.
The SEC’s whiplash policy reversal—from vigorous enforcement against unscrupulous crypto players to possible abandonment of a strong case—creates the appearance that political considerations, not legal merits, potentially drove this decision. The American public deserve to know whether the SEC’s independence has been compromised and whether justice in our markets has been subordinated to political interests. I therefore demand answers from you.
Representative Waters, who leads House Financial Services Democrats, could potentially chair the committee if her party retakes the House in 2026.