Key Points
- •Swedish MPs propose a national Bitcoin reserve.
- •Seized BTC funds to be utilized.
- •No move towards introducing CBDCs.
Swedish lawmakers Dennis Dioukarev and David Perez have submitted a parliamentary motion proposing a national Bitcoin reserve, potentially funded by seized BTC, while officially rejecting the creation of a CBDC.
The proposal signals Sweden's unique approach to national cryptocurrency management and separates itself from global trends favoring CBDCs, potentially influencing future policy directions.
The Swedish Parliament received a proposal for a national Bitcoin reserve from lawmakers Dennis Dioukarev and David Perez. This motion seeks to leverage seized BTC assets, focusing on financial independence without introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
MPs Dioukarev and Perez of the Sweden Democrats initiated Motion 2025/26:793 advocating for a strategic Bitcoin reserve. This effort represents a policy shift against CBDCs, aligning with recent presentations by industry experts.
“After JAN3’s presentation at the Swedish Parliament, MPs @DennisDioukarev and David Perez submitted a motion to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and, crucially, to formally declare that Sweden will not introduce a CBDC.” – Samson Mow, CEO, JAN3
The proposal involves using over $8.3 million in seized Bitcoin for the reserve, avoiding new state expenditures. Immediate market impacts are minimal but signify growing government interest in cryptocurrency adoption.
Financially, deploying seized assets reduces state budget strain and underscores a rejection of CBDC trends globally. Politically, Sweden aligns with countries exploring Bitcoin reserves like the US and Kazakhstan.
Sweden's proposal indicates a potential shift in European crypto regulation. Industry and government dynamics may change as the Finance Committee reviews the motion on October 15, 2025.
Historically, countries like Finland and the UK have auctioned seized Bitcoin. However, Sweden's approach suggests long-term strategic interests and challenges the centralization trends seen with CBDCs. Future actions could influence broader adoption among nations.