Vitalik Buterin Backs Maxwell’s Bitcoin Core Stance

Bitcoin Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin highlighted a recent discussion in the Bitcoin community where Greg Maxwell, a Bitcoin core developer, defended the core team’s approach to the network.

In the debate, which was part of the BitcoinTalk “Core and spam debate – easy explanation” thread, Maxwell said Bitcoin is built on economic incentives and self-interest, not popular opinion or “cancel culture.” The network tolerates some wasteful or silly activity because keeping it open and censorship-resistant is more important than controlling “spam.”

Vitalik called Maxwell’s view “a principled commitment to freedom and open market-based resource allocation against the populist desire to censor the Current Hated Thing.”

Contributors work for themselves

Maxwell said, “The Bitcoin project isn’t going to meet would-be censors halfway simply because they were loud and obnoxious, or because they throw out legal threats or try to bring down adverse actions by governments.”

He said contributors work for themselves, they want a system they can trust, not a product for others. Many dislike non-fungible tokens (NFTs) or “shitcoins,” but they accept them as the cost of keeping the system open.

Greg Maxwell added that people who work on Bitcoin do it for themselves. Even if some are paid, it’s for the benefit of those paying, not to please users. As Maxwell put it, “Everyone is invited to share in the benefits, but no one should force you to work against your own interest.” Bitcoin has always faced criticism, and those who don’t like it simply don’t have to use it.

Community reaction

The comments sparked pushback online. One critic dismissed Maxwell’s argument, saying it doesn’t make sense to claim contributors aren’t also users of Bitcoin. But Buterin defended the point, suggesting that Maxwell’s perspective sees a good protocol as a kind of work of art, where the system’s design matters more than individual complaints.

The discussion shows the ongoing tension in the Bitcoin community between sticking to strict technical rules and reacting to social pressures, a debate that has been around since the network started.